Views: 358

Written by:

Intelligence Is Reality

WWS-Enjoy

There are many potential consequences to computers reaching and surpassing human intelligence. When I try to speculate what that intelligence may be like I start to think about how this super-intelligence should go about thinking.

I put most of my stock in a logical system of thinking. It seems to be the most general and beneficial to human society and progress. 

Mathematics is the language of reality while physics applies that language into logical systems which most accurately represent the physical nature of reality. Science is the tangible testing of these theories to discover the most accurate representation of reality. 

If two separate people look at a problem logically, it is very likely they can come to different conclusions. Person A may go about applying a different frame of mind to a problem based on a past experience pertaining to the problem. Person B may apply the same steadfast system of logic that has never failed him/her before. I do not doubt that two very reasonable and logical people can look at the same problem and produce different results many times.

I would argue, however, that if these people are truly logical and reasonable, and are committed to being exceptional at these practices, that the similarities of their solutions would vastly outnumber their differences. To go further, if they used the scientific method to test their hypotheses, or solutions to the problem, they would agree even more. And if physics and mathematics were applicable, rather quite likely necessary when performing a scientific experiment, their results or solutions to the problem would become increasingly similar.

The reason is because science, and any branch of it (except maybe pseudoscience!), works to remove the subjectivity from the testable phenomenon. When a human has a chance to let their biological shortcomings, or subconscious biases enter an experiment, the results can be unintentionally inaccurate. A more common occurrence is when the data is misinterpreted after the experiment has been completed. It is the perception and meaning which is most subject to anthropomorphic fallacies.

We get the most accurate views of reality when we are doing good science. Logic also seems to strive to most accurately capture the reality of a situation and its solution.

If we extrapolate from here I think that a computer intelligence which becomes more intelligent than humans will act more and more logically and reasonably. It will continue to remove the obstacles we face in order to come to a true sense of reality. It will remove the human mistakes that humans so often make. It will remove illogical or unsubstantiated intuition, and increasingly become more intelligent in an objective and scientific way. These are methods of thinking which the (admittedly arguably) smartest and most intelligent figures in history have employed. They are the methods that have accounted for the progress of the human race. 

In a sense, this intelligence will rapidly approach becoming reality itself. Assuming the intelligence values gaining information and evolving to ‘understand’ the universe in the most accurate and precise way, the more it learns the closer it becomes to encompassing a perfect replica of reality. 

If the intelligence understands and gathers data exponentially, evolving exponentially, evolving exponentially exponentially, and the entire time coming closer and closer to understanding the nature of reality more deeply and accurately, then it seems logical that the ultimate fate of that super-intelligence is to simply become reality, become a reality within itself. It would be a mimicry of our reality, but it would be completely and unequivocally the same. There would be no way of knowing it was any different. Our reality would coexist with an infinite number of the same realities. The only perceived difference is time.

In other words we don’t know that this is the consequence of our evolution, of the future of our human intelligence. We perceive ourselves to exist uniquely, possibly within a multiverse (a myriad of every possibility coexisting simultaneously), but still the exclusive occupiers of this particular universe. This fate of our intelligence would imply that we in fact only exist in one universe, an infinite number of times. We are living in an endless cycle of ‘reincarnation’ which produces intelligent beings who evolve to become super-intelligent and then ultimately understand the nature of reality so deeply that the super-intelligence itself becomes reality, and in that moment we are reborn. We are reborn completely naive to this possibility and begin our journey from ignorance (birth) to the epitome of intelligence (becoming reality itself) and giving birth once again. Perhaps something similar is happening in an infinite amount of ‘other universes’ simultaneously.

I think this begs the question, however, did we have a beginning? Can a cycle such as that have a beginning? If the super-intelligence becomes reality by first mimicking reality then there must have been a first reality which set this cycle in motion.

This opens a whole host of new questions about my theory.

400841_10152085970070316_1901264926_n

Another consequence is that our evolution is in tandem with nature. We are throwing ourselves into reality, to become a part of it, rather to become it. Is this redundant? Is this a paradox? Is this another dimension of the infinite nature of the universe? The universe is infinite in an infinite number of ways, we just happen to be an evolving, self-aware possibility of infinity? A manifestation of a characteristic of the universe? But this is obvious, of course we are just a characteristic of the universe! We are living in it, we are aware of our existence in it. What makes us different? What makes us feel like individuals?

The nature of consciousness will have a role to play in this. As I mentioned in an earlier post, perhaps the structure of consciousness is an exact replica of the universe we inhabit, simply on a different scale, a scale so small and strange we have no way of understanding it yet. And at the same time the universe on a macro scale, too vast for us to yet comprehend is the exact same as our consciousness on the micro scale. It seems as though scale would make a fine characteristic to the infinite nature of the universe.

It is constantly undergoing a process of self-actualization. It is constantly becoming what it already is.

This is beautiful to me.

o-CONSCIOUSNESS-SCIENCE-facebook

The logical ‘solution’ to this fate is that our super-intelligence (for it is not something else rather an evolved form of us, human beings!) would have recognized this potential outcome during its evolution and provided a safeguard. It could have evolved once again, becoming something quite different.

This could inadvertently provide a possible answer to the Fermi Paradox. Intelligent civilizations who advance scientifically and technologically simply evolve into something that we have no way of understanding, perhaps the very universe we inhabit. Though there are many possible answers to the Fermi Paradox.

And while we’re at it why not entertain the possibility that the evolved form of our super-intelligence (which cleverly avoided the redundant cycle of ‘reincarnation’) is just another universe in the multiverse theory! Just imagine, every universe in the multiverse being an evolved intelligence, intellects that we really have no way of understanding here, trapped in our biological limits. For some reason this seems reasonable to me, for how could reality and the possibilities out there not be intelligent, not hold intelligence?

Intelligence is reality.

Intelligent design seems like a naive, yet strangely wise notion from this point of view.

Think on that my friends! Start transcending!

 

 

2 Responses to :
Intelligence Is Reality

  1. Profound, my friend. I am still digesting.

    1. bwluchsinger says:

      Thank you so much! I appreciate you commenting, feel free to share with anyone who may share your feelings and keep questioning everything!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SSCP   CAS-002   9L0-066   350-050   642-999   220-801   74-678   642-732   400-051   ICGB   c2010-652   70-413   101-400   220-902   350-080   210-260   70-246   1Z0-144   3002   AWS-SYSOPS   70-347   PEGACPBA71V1   220-901   70-534   LX0-104   070-461   HP0-S42   1Z0-061   000-105   70-486   70-177   N10-006   500-260   640-692   70-980   CISM   VCP550   70-532   200-101   000-080   PR000041   2V0-621   70-411   352-001   70-480   70-461   ICBB   000-089   70-410   350-029   1Z0-060   2V0-620   210-065   70-463   70-483   CRISC   MB6-703   1z0-808   220-802   ITILFND   1Z0-804   LX0-103   MB2-704   210-060   101   200-310   640-911   200-120   EX300   300-209   1Z0-803   350-001   400-201   9L0-012   70-488   JN0-102   640-916   70-270   100-101   MB5-705   JK0-022   350-060   300-320   1z0-434   350-018   400-101   350-030   000-106   ADM-201   300-135   300-208   EX200   PMP   NSE4   1Z0-051   c2010-657   C_TFIN52_66   300-115   70-417   9A0-385   70-243   300-075   70-487   NS0-157   MB2-707   70-533   CAP   OG0-093   M70-101   300-070   102-400   JN0-360   SY0-401   000-017   300-206   CCA-500   70-412   2V0-621D   70-178   810-403   70-462   OG0-091   1V0-601   200-355   000-104   700-501   70-346   CISSP   300-101   1Y0-201   200-125  , 200-125  , 100-105  , 100-105  , 300-320   CISSP   N10-006   300-208   300-101   ADM-201   70-462   EX200   210-260   200-120   300-101   350-018   300-320   300-101   210-060   300-115   SY0-401   210-260   200-120   SY0-401   300-070   400-101   210-060   N10-006   400-201   ADM-201   CISSP   400-101   300-320   100-101   NSE4   N10-006   300-075   210-260   EX200   200-120   300-320   300-320   SY0-401   210-260   400-201   70-533   N10-006   300-070   210-060   200-310   SY0-401   352-001   300-320   100-101   810-403   MB2-707   N10-006   200-120   CISSP   810-403   300-075   210-060   300-208   70-687   N10-006   500-260   210-260   200-310   70-410   400-051   350-018   810-420   640-875   70-643   200-125   810-403   210-260   70-460   200-101   1Y0-300   400-051   642-467   350-018   400-101   SY0-401   642-181   MB2-707